The Use of Historical Method Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

The Use of Historical Method - Term Paper ExampleSome historians are as well as enkindle in asking how and so what. Various questions in history are hard to answer because 1) sources do not fully describe what happened, or do not honestly explain why they did something 2) sources sometimes use couched or diplomatic words to express themselves 3) history is a complex combination of numerous factors, such as culture, morality, beliefs, et al., that affect language and ways of communicating and understanding each other 4) definitions are not universally agreed upon and 5) subjects change throughout time. Proper historical composing seeks out facts. In reality, however, facts can be presented with biases, because historians themselves have different viewpoints on what happened and why/how they happened. Proper historical writing should also differentiate facts from assertions. If historians want to talk roughly interpretations or arguments, they must be clear about this intention in their writings. History should not be about what they think happened, but what truly happened. In the absence of facts, historians offer conjectures and theories about history. Some fields of science accuse social science as a phony science, because it is open to researcher bias and methodological weaknesses. Social science research, however, can respond to these weaknesses and reduce writer bias and methodological flaws, thereby up(a) the validity of their methods, findings, and conclusions. The problems of social science research are researcher bias, bad data set, logical fallacies, relativism and normative definitions, level of certainty and variations, credibility of sources, misleading statistics, mistaking of facts, conspiracy theories, and other research problems that concern language. Like other research, their analysis and conclusions can also be prone to fallacies in reasoning. Some of the common problems with writing are 1) not knowing who your audience is, and so the la nguage and writing style do not fit their level of knowledge and expectations, 2) using bias language that alienate or discriminate other groups, 3) not using the right punctuation marks, and 4) not proofreading. Proofreading is essential because it catches and corrects typographical, grammatical, spelling, and usage errors. Student should maximize lively writing centers. These centers can help them make their thesis, outline, and first draft. The advantages of primary source are that writers can interpret the primary sources for themselves, instead of relying on the interpretations of others, and primary sources assembly data firsthand, thereby reducing bias from having someone interpret it. Secondary sources are helpful in gathering background or historical information about a topic, and in expanding understanding on events or subjects, by exposing the readers to different perspectives, interpretations, and conclusions. Secondary sources also already synthesize or combine studie s and facts, thereby reducing time needed to read them all. What historians add or not add to history impact their narration of facts. It is interesting how world history books, for instance, hold or do not include certain events, people, and conjectures. This may be due to the need of condensing material, but this can also be united to what the writers and publishers think as important and unimportant. Sometimes, I read history and ask, how about the women? What